DEAR PROCON.ORG READERS: We’re being outspent by biased organizations that use millions of dollars to misinform you. This week we’re asking our readers to help us. We survive on donations, which keep us independent and ad-free. If every one of our readers gave $3 now, the price of a cup of coffee, our fundraiser would be over. We’re a small nonprofit, but it costs a lot to keep our servers, research staff, and programs going. ProCon.org is your oasis on the Internet for unbiased information on important issues. If ProCon.org is useful to you, please take a minute to keep us online and ad-free. Thank you.

Video exploring critical thinking and how it leads to great citizen involvement

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Dec. 20, 2005 press release stated:

"'Intelligent Design' is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover.

The decision is a victory not only for the ACLU, who led the legal challenge, but for all who believe it is inappropriate, and unconstitutional, to advance a particular religious belief at the expense of our children's education."
Dec. 20, 2005 ACLU

The Christian Science Monitor reported the following in its Dec. 20, 2005 article titled "Banned In Biology Class: Intelligent Design," written by Peter Grier and Josh Burek :

"'Intelligent design' is just another name for creationism - and therefore teaching it in public schools violates the constitutional principle of church-state separation.

That is the bottom line from the decision in perhaps the biggest courtroom clash on the theory of evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial. On Tuesday a federal judge ruled that Pennsylvania's Dover Area School District broke the law when it became one of the first school districts in the United States to include intelligent design in its science curriculum.

The ruling is a blow to certain Christian conservatives, who have been pushing intelligent-design initiatives in upwards of 30 states. It comes as vindication for scientists who have seen this push as an attack on the method of scientific inquiry...

'In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether [intelligent design] is science. We have concluded it is not, [Judge John E. Jones III] wrote in his opinion.

That said, Jones added that proponents of intelligent design have deeply held beliefs, and the concept should continue to be studied and discussed."
Dec. 20, 2005 - Christian Science Monitor

Links to Related Information:

Our question "Should Intelligent Design be taught in public schools?" addresses the pros and cons of the teaching of "intelligent design" in public school.

Read Judge John E. Jones' Kitzmiller v. Dover opinion (PDF 310KB)

DONATE - Donate to ProCon.org - DONATE
Visit the ProCon.org community on:
Reprinting Policy | How to Cite ProCon.org | Media & Press | Donate to ProCon.org | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Debate Topics | State Laws | History of... | Critical Thinking Quotes | Teaching Controversial Issues

© 2015 ProCon.org, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit | 233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Santa Monica, CA 90401 | Tel: 310-451-9596